- AV will not substantially change the outcome from the present FPTP, so why bother?
- It might allow the candidate who came second (or even third) to win
- It would not be more proportional than the present system (not that I want proportional representation anyway).
- It runs counter to our political traditions; reformers may mock this but FPTP is generally accepted by the people. At least there is no popular movement for electoral reform other than among the chattering classes.
- It would spoil election night; many of us love that!
- It would unduly benefit the centre party as being the 'lesser of two evils'.
- It might curb radical political ideas that from time to time have invigorated our nation as each party becomes afraid of alienating the middle ground.
- FPTP recognises the social diversity of the nation; we tend to get the MPs we want; contrary to popular belief the vast majority of constituents are very happy with their MP, even if they did not vote for him or her.
- AV would do nothing to give a voice to minorities or smaller parties.
- The added mystery and complexity of the count would remove politics from the people; low turnout is has nothing to do with FPTP.
Showing posts with label FPTP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FPTP. Show all posts
Friday, 14 January 2011
10 reasons to vote No to AV.
Later this year we are to be offered a referendum on replacing the First Past The Post (FPTP) electoral system with that of the Alternative Vote (AV) for Westminster elections. Here are 10 good reasons to vote NO:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)