It is hard to make sense of these figures. Why do some communities suffer so much more than others? There is no obvious answer, but there are some clues. The mining villages and working class areas to seem to have suffered more (although this is a generalisation). The highest proportion of deaths in Flintshire was in the Bettisfield area (36.4% dead) - a notable mining village at that time. It would take more research and study to fully answer this question.
Whatever the reason for the variation in casualties for communities across Flintshire, the statistics show that if you signed up, or were conscripted, into the armed forces during the Great War your chances of returning were roughly between one in three and one in five. It brings home the impact of this most dreadful of conflicts. When the call-up papers landed on the mat they were not exactly a death sentence, but they were pretty close. Especially if you came from certain areas of the county.
For my Caerwys readers it should be noted that 88 men were enlisted, and 16 were lost. A percentage of 18.2%. I wish I had known this figure when I was writing the history of the town.
This shows in graphical form the relationship between the numbers that enlisted and those that died. | Once again, thank you to the bearded wonder that provided this wealth of information. |
Fascinating stuff - it sort of proves the complete randomness of surviving the Great War. Do you have the figures of Connah's Quay and Shotton to hand?
ReplyDeleteYes, Shotton - 301 men served, 47 were killed; a rate of 15.6%. For Connah's Quay 437 men served and 70 were killed, a rate of 16.0%. They are quite similar figures and I imagine that the men must have fought in similar circumstances.
ReplyDelete